Effect of Commingling on Characterization

In general, the “commingling”—mixing—of separate and community property into one whole does not destroy the character of its respective components if their amounts can be ascertained.

However, when property is so commingled that the separate and community components cannot be traced and identified, the general presumption in favor of community property, Fam. Code § 760

requires that all of the commingled property be characterized as community.

If a community presumption thus arises, the burden is on the spouse asserting that the property is separate to overcome the community presumption by tracing the funds to a separate source, assuming that tracing is permissible in a particular case.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

DEBT LIABILITY IN A DIVORCE The separate property of a married person is liable for the following debts incurred by the person’s spouse during marriage (1) A debt incurred for "necessaries of life" of

DEBT ALLOCATION IN A DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE On dissolution or legal separation, debts incurred by either spouse after the date of marriage but before the date of separation must be divided as set for

Because spouses occupy confidential relations with one another, when an interspousal transaction creates an advantage for one spouse over the other, a presumption of undue influence arises, and the bu